If an employee can no longer perform the job’s essential functions, reasonable accommodation might include transfer to a different job or schedule.1
As part of the interactive process, employers should evaluate suitable alternate, vacant positions for an employee with a disability. Employers must offer employees with disabilities alternative positions, for which they are qualified, when:
If there are no funded, vacant comparable positions available for an employee with a disability, the employer may reassign the employee to a lower graded or lower paid position.
An employer isn’t required to create a new position to accommodate an employee with a disability to a greater extent than an employer would offer a new position to any employee, regardless of disability.
An employee with a disability is entitled to preference in reassignment to a vacant position over other applicants and existing employees. Although an employer isn’t ordinarily required to ignore its seniority system/policy to accommodate an employee, the violation may be reasonable for accommodating a disabled employee if the employer reserves the right to modify its seniority system or regularly allows variations to the policy. For more information, see Seniority System and Accommodation.
Employers should only reassign employees returning to work from a disability to an alternative position after participating in the interactive process.3 During the interactive process, employers may offer to reassign a disabled employee to a temporary position, which the employee may choose to accept or reject. However, assignment to a temporary position isn’t considered a reasonable accommodation under California’s disability regulations.
Reasonably accommodating an employee with a disability doesn’t include putting an employee into a position for which that person isn’t qualified, nor is an employer required to continue to employ the person on an open-ended leave of absence while waiting for an appropriate vacant position to arise.4
If an employee requests reassignment due to the stress or anxiety caused by a particular supervisor, employers may not have to accommodate the reassignment. Under California law, courts have held that an employee’s inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor’s standard oversight of the employee’s job performance doesn’t constitute a FEHA-recognized disability.5 However, it’s important to note that such an employee may still be protected by multiple laws. For example, the employee may be entitled to take leave under the CFRA and/or FMLA for a serious health condition or may be entitled to a leave as a reasonable accommodation under the FEHA or ADA while they seek treatment.
1. 2 CCR sec. 11068(d)
2. 2 CCR sec. 11068(d)(1)
3. 2 CCR sec.11068(d)
4. Nealy v. City of Santa Monica, 234 Cal. App. 4th 359 (2015)
5. Higgins-Williams v. Sutter Med. Found., 237 Cal. App. 4th 78 (2015)