Interviewing candidates is your opportunity to learn more about your applicants, and to determine which applicant is best for you, based on the candidates':
Be careful of questions that may be perceived as discriminatory or that violate the law. Any question prohibited on a job application is prohibited in an interview.
You must train supervisors who participate in the interview process not to exaggerate the employment opportunity no matter how anxious they are to recruit the candidate. An interviewing supervisor can create significant liability for their employer if they convince a candidate to leave secure employment by knowingly making false promises about the terms of the candidate's future employment.1
To ensure that the interviews you conduct don’t expose you to lawsuits, create a list of acceptable questions and stick to them. Be sure all questions are strictly job-related, nondiscriminatory and not an invasion of the candidate’s privacy.
Potentially discriminatory questions can take many forms but, generally, these are questions that might elicit information about a protected characteristic. The following are some examples:
Due to potential liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and FEHA, familiarize yourself with the basic requirements of those laws before conducting interviews. Though it may seem only natural to ask certain questions of a candidate whose physical disability is obvious to you, many of those questions may be strictly prohibited. For more information, see Disability-Related Inquiries.
It's often necessary to take notes during interviews so you can review the notes when making a final decision. However, it is important to ensure that you record information in a way that won't cause you problems in court. Take brief, clear and legible notes that pertain only to the candidate's answers.
If you're not careful, upon close examination, notes taken during an interview can give a discriminatory impression and subject you to discrimination claims.
Consider the following real-life scenario: An employer made a notation on the application of a candidate for a position at the jewelry counter of a large department store. While he intended the notation to mean “no experience selling jewelry,” the words “no jew” resulted in the candidate filing religious discrimination charges against the store.
If you’re taking notes about the candidate’s responses to questions, be sure that you’re not using abbreviations or a coded rating system that could be incorrectly interpreted at a later date.
Keep objective records of why a candidate was or wasn’t hired. For example:
Be sure your notes evaluate criteria actually necessary to perform the job. For instance, when interviewing for an administrative assistant, your notes should reflect items such as “good interpersonal skills, types 75 wpm,” rather than “nice suit.”
1. Helmer v. Bingham Toyota Isuzu, 129 Cal. App. 4th 1121 (2005)
2. Lab. Code sec. 980