Telecommuting, or remote work, is an accepted practice in many workplaces, though it creates unique issues that must be addressed if the employment relationship is to run smoothly and you are to avoid litigation.
Telecommuting arrangements generate a number of legal issues relating to federal and state wage and hour laws:
Adopt a systematic approach to telecommuting requests, perhaps by creating a standard request form that you can use to track any inequities in the decision-making process. Stay out of the issue of why the employee wants to telecommute altogether, to avoid making a value judgment about whether one employee’s new baby is more important than another employee’s plans to go to law school at night. Keep disability accommodation issues in mind.
Although the following may not apply to all employers, you should at least consider these issues when developing your telecommuting policy:
Establish policies to deal with confidentiality and privacy issues, including monitoring how the worker:
Address the applicability of the company’s computer and phone usage policies to telecommuters or the need for amended policies for telecommuters only.
If an employee works outside the state in which the employer’s company office is located, the law in the state in which the employee works is, in most cases, the law that covers them. For example, an employee in Nevada working at home for an employer headquartered in California is generally governed by Nevada employment laws. However, if the out-of-state employee travels to California to work for a California based employer, California’s overtime laws apply to any work for a full day or week.1 For more information, see “Nonresidents Entitled to Overtime for Work in California” in Understanding Basic Overtime Requirements.
Similarly, for employees outside the city or county where the company’s office is located, make sure you monitor and comply with local employment-related ordinances in the employee’s location. For example, many cities and counties have enacted minimum wage and sick leave ordinances that could affect employees working in a remote location.
1. Sullivan v. Oracle Corporation, 51 Cal. 4th 1191 (2011)