Employers in California have an affirmative duty to take reasonable steps necessary to prevent and promptly correct discriminatory and harassing conduct. Employers must create a work environment free from prohibited employment practices.1
This section contains the following information:
These reasonable steps in preventing harassment include an obligation to inform employees about their protections against harassment in the workplace, including:
Whether an employer has met its duty to take reasonable steps to prevent and correct harassing conduct will be examined individually, on a case-by-case basis, looking at many factors that sometimes are unique to the particular employer.2
These factors may include, but are not limited to:
Take your prevention obligations seriously. A strong effort to prevent harassment can:
An employee cannot sue for failure to prevent harassment as a “stand-alone” claim. Instead, the employee must also have a valid underlying claim of discrimination, harassment or retaliation. However, the CRD can independently seek non-monetary preventative remedies for a violation of the duty to prevent, regardless of whether the employee has prevailed on an underlying claim.3 For instance, the CRD could mandate the employer to take preventive steps such as training or implementing new policies and practices.
The following is a discussion of the steps that need to be taken to ensure that employees are informed about their protections.
California law requires employers to develop written harassment, discrimination and retaliation prevention policies.4
The fact that you maintain an anti-harassment policy and an internal complaint procedure does not completely insulate you from liability for harassment. If your policy does not specifically prohibit harassment or if your procedure requires that an employee must first report an incident to a supervisor who might actually be the harasser, the policies and procedures are not effective and are not compliant with the law.
Your harassment, discrimination and retaliation prevention policy must meet ten different requirements.5
Your policy must:
These are the minimum legal requirements for a written prevention policy under California law. In addition, it is a best practice for an employer’s harassment prevention policy to:
You must distribute your harassment, discrimination and retaliation prevention policy using one or more of the following methods:6
A multi-lingual workforce can make it more difficult for an employer to communicate anti-harassment policies to employees and make it more difficult for the employer to determine what “reasonable steps” it should take to prevent harassment.
Under California law, if your workforce at any facility or establishment contains 10 percent or more of persons who speak a language other than English as their spoken language, you must translate your policy into every language spoken by at least 10 percent of the workforce.7
A federal case highlights why this issue is important. In EEOC v. The Spud Seller Inc., a federal court ruled that the employer could not use the Ellerth/Faragher defense in a sexual harassment lawsuit because the employer’s policy was not translated into Spanish or that written translations of the policy were provided to Spanish-speaking employees.
All the victims in the harassment case were Spanish-speaking employees. The employer did “explain” the policy once per year to employees, but, as the court noted, the person responsible for explaining and interpreting the policy for Spanish-speaking employees was the person accused of harassing female employees.8
In addition, the court found that the policy did not provide a meaningful remedy for Spanish-speaking employees because the employees could not make a complaint directly to the persons identified in the policy because those persons did not speak Spanish. An employee would have to supply an interpreter or ask another employee to interpret, which the court found deprived Spanish-speaking employees of their right to confidentiality.
Finally, the court found that the policy was deficient because it did not contain a provision explaining to employees that they could not be retaliated against because of making a complaint of sexual harassment.
Employers with multi-lingual workforces should take steps to make sure that their policies are clearly communicated and effective:
In addition to the requirement to have a written harassment, discrimination and retaliation prevention policy, employers also have other harassment-related posting and notice requirements:
At a minimum, the pamphlet must include the following information:10
California law does not specifically require that you provide harassment pamphlets to independent contractors. However, if you are covered by FEHA, it is prudent to provide pamphlets to independent contractors so they will be aware of your reporting and anti-harassment policies.
Under California law, talent agencies are required to provide sexual harassment prevention training and reporting resources to artists they sign for representation.11
The sexual harassment training and education requirements vary based on whether the artist is an adult or a minor.
Talent agencies must provide their adult artists with educational materials on sexual harassment prevention, retaliation and reporting resources, as well as on nutrition and eating disorders. All materials must be provided within 90 days of agreeing to representation by the agency, or agency procurement of an engagement, meeting, or interview, whichever comes first. The education materials:
Artists between the ages of 14 and 17, along with their parent or legal guardian, must receive and complete training in sexual harassment prevention, retaliation and reporting resources before they are issued a work permit. The training must be administered by a third-party vendor, on-site, electronically, via Internet website, or other means. It must be in a language understood by that person and must include, at a minimum, the components in the CRD’s Form 185 - Sexual Harassment.
Talent agencies are required to keep records for three years confirming that the educational materials have been made available to artists as required. Additionally, as part of their license renewal process, they must confirm to the Labor Commissioner that they are providing the relevant educational materials. A penalty of $100 per violation can be assessed, unless the Labor Commissioner determines the violation was a clerical error or an inadvertent mistake.
1. Govt. Code sec. 12940(k); 2 CCR sec. 11023
2. 2 CCR sec. 11023(a)(1)
3. 2 CCR sec. 11023(a)(2)(3)
4. 2 CCR sec.11023
5. 2 CCR sec. 11023(b)
6. 2 CCR sec. 11023(c)
7. 2 CCR sec. 11023(d)
8. EEOC v. The Spud Seller, Inc., 899 F.Supp.2d 1081 (D.CO. 2012)
9. Govt. Code sec. 12950(a)
10. Govt. Code sec. 12950(b)
11. Labor Code secs. 1700.50-1700.54